Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:11
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Which is the most liked web series in India?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Coco Gauff tops Aryna Sabalenka to give the French Open an American champion - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Another Bodybuilder Just Died a Horrible Death - futurism.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Is sunscreen toxic? The UV truthers on the internet sure think so. - The Boston Globe
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear: